D-GA44 FUEL DISPENSER

D-GA44 FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type: Optional

Inlet Pressure : >=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.) :55±5

Suction Distance (m): 6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type: Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle : Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type: Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price: 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight : 335kg

Dimension(L×W×H): 1270 x 620 x 2420(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container: 40ft: 45 20ft: 22

Qv── flowage passed over in fuel dispenser (L/min.) t── measuring time (s) Pu── unit price of oil (�L) Pj── money showed in display screen (� Pc── due sum (� EVmax── the maximum value of relative error measured under regulating flow rate;(%) Evmin──the minimum value of relative error measured under regulating flow rate;(%) En──repeatability of measurement (%) EP──error of paid sum 3.2 Determination of testing results Error Ev, Repeatability of measurement En and Due sum error Ep comes out after calculating testing dat fuel dispenser a. The largest value of Error Ev in testing is regarded as the basic error of fuel dispenser according to the regulation of JJG443-98. The larger value of Repeatability of measurement En in two flow rate testing presents the repeatability of fuel dispenser. Error Ev should be 0.3%, repeatability of measurement no more than 0.15%, if fuel dispenser beyond these scopes testing would be determined as unqualified. The contents of money indication and money error are not regulated in the approval procedure of JJG443-98. There would exist a little error after long refueling because usually the calculation of paid mone fuel dispenser y adapts the round –mode. Example of indicating valve appraisal Take an appraisal of fuel dispenser 6~60L/min for example, it is usually adapted non-presetting mode in filing station. Setting unit price as 2.75�L and preparing metal standard measurer of 100L, conduct 3 tests as maximum flow rate 60L/min and minimum flow rate 12L/min, respectively. Testing result is listed in Table 6-1. Table 6-1 Appraisal Results Article IV Important notices in appraisal Indicating value appraisal is crucial part of fuel dispenser’s testing items, which is direct foundation to determine the accuracy and qualification of fuel dispenser. The appraisal method and data processing introduced in Article III is based upon JJG443-98. Filling station should consult the above procedure and conduct self appraisal in accordance with relative requirements o

ent of a tunable laser system pro-　　investigation of eutectic fixed point materials　　 viding radiation in the near infrared for　　above the copper point the PTB is involved as　　 radiometry was successful at the first attempt.　　a member of a worldwide association coordi-　　 The pump laser used for the optical paramet-　　nated by the relevant CCT working group　　 fuel dispenser ric oscillator was a thin disk laser (Figure 9)　　and as a member of an EU project. In a　　 which had been developed in cooperation　　EUROMET comparison of PtPd thermocou-　　 with a leading laser manufacturer. The pro-　　p fuel dispenser les at the fixed point of copper the thermo-　　 cedure will be extended to the wavelength　　couples compared proved to be extremely　　 region up to 10 碌m.　　stable (Fig fuel dispenser ure 7).　　 Metrology with synchrotron radiation　　In the area of applied thermometry the PTB is　　responsible for the traceability of meanwhile In the Photon Radiometry Department at the　　more than 40 DKD laboratories. BESSY II Storage Ring different detectors　　 were investigated and successfully character-　　Tests of climatic chambers revealed consider-　　 ized: photodiodes for the EUV spectral re-　　able temperature differences between sensors　　 gion tunnel diodes for high spatial resolution　　of different emittances. To eliminate this　　

rk on their own PECS. Perhaps the WTO, an organisation suddenly left with time on its hands, could help out. “No one argues that this tangle of trade deals is the best way to organise world trade,�he writes. But no one thinks they are going away either. Only last November, for example, the Bangkok Agreement, signed in 1975 as Asia s first preferential trade agreement between developing countries, revived itself with a new name—the Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement—and a new ambition to impose some common standards on Asia s noodle soup of trade deals. Eve fuel dispenser n Mongolia is interested in joining. * “Multilateralising Regionalism Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade� CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5775 © 2006 .  About sponsorship Differences between the sexes The mismeasu fuel dispenser re of woman Aug 3rd 2006 From The Economist print edition Men and women think differently. But not that differently IN THE 1970s there was a fad for giving dolls to baby boys and fire-engines to baby girls. The idea was that differences in behaviour betwee fuel dispenser n the sexes were solely the result of upbringing culture turned women into ironers, knitters and chatterboxes, and men into hammerers, drillers and silent types. Switching toys would put an end to sexual sorting. Today, it is clear why it did not. When boys and girls are born, they are already different, and they favour different toys from the beginning. That boys and girls—and men and women—are programmed by evolution to behave differently from one another is now widely accepted. Surely, no one today would think of doing what John Money, of Johns Hopkins University, did in 1967 amputating the genitalia of a boy who had suffered a botched circumcision, and advising the parents to bring him up as a girl. The experiment didn t work, and the consequences were tragic. But which of the differences between the sexes are “biological� in the